Final score is calculated by weighting and averaging all datapoints across multiple categories.
The fundamental gameplay experience including fun factor, mechanics, and technical performance.
The core experience is rated moderately well because the fundamental gameplay and build customization are enjoyable, but this is consistently undermined by persistent technical performance problems and concerns about game balance.
Story quality, world depth, replay value, and overall content value.
This category receives a mixed score because while players appreciate the game's aesthetic and potential, they are frustrated by a lack of engaging endgame content, repetitive mission design, and monetization that feels unrewarding.
Visual and audio quality combined with creative and innovative design elements.
The game's presentation and innovation are viewed as average; while the distinct art style and creative character concepts are praised, the experience is held back by recurring graphical glitches and a feeling that the core gameplay loop is too familiar.
Multiplayer features, social aspects, and developer support systems.
Community and social aspects receive a mixed reception because while the player base is seen as helpful and developers are communicative, the multiplayer experience is hindered by technical issues and a lack of compelling endgame content to sustain group play.
Our True-Review is based on 10 datapoints collected over multiple days. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance. These weighted scores are then averaged to calculate the final True-Review score.
You can look at the scores and weights and make adjustments to see where we derive the final from. Tinker, play, test and above all else - have fun!
Open Score TinkererOur reviews are based on comprehensive datapoint analysis collected over multiple days of community feedback and gameplay data. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance in the overall experience.
Learn more about our methodologyPure enjoyment and entertainment value of playing the game.
Players find the core combat loop and character progression inherently enjoyable, especially when discovering powerful new builds and playing with friends. However, this fun is often undermined by a repetitive endgame that lacks variety, leading to burnout. Ongoing technical glitches and frustrating balance problems can also interrupt the experience, preventing the game's strong foundation from consistently delivering sustained entertainment.
Quality of primary gameplay systems including combat, controls, and core interaction loops.
The community is drawn to the intricate build customization and the satisfaction of optimizing a character's power through complex systems. Players enjoy the theory-crafting and the potential that new weapon types bring to combat. However, persistent balance issues, particularly the disparity between skill and weapon effectiveness, create frustration and limit viable playstyles, while performance problems can detract from the otherwise engaging combat.
Game stability, optimization, frame rate, bugs, and overall technical execution.
Player experience with performance is inconsistent, creating a divided sentiment. While many acknowledge the developer's efforts to fix bugs and appreciate recent quality-of-life updates, significant problems remain. Frequent stuttering, frame rate drops, and visual artifacts are common complaints across various hardware configurations, detracting from the game's visual appeal and preventing a smooth, immersive experience.
Overall quality of story, world-building, characters, and narrative pacing across all content.
While players praise the game's high-quality art, sound design, and recent narrative additions, they express significant frustration with the content loop itself. The core issue is a lack of engaging and varied endgame activities, which makes the experience feel repetitive over time. Many in the community feel the pace of meaningful content updates is too slow, leading to periods of stagnation and a sense that the game isn't evolving quickly enough to maintain long-term interest.
Amount of content, replayability factors, and long-term engagement potential.
The game's long-term appeal is a point of contention, with players feeling it has strong potential but currently falls short in execution. The enjoyment of perfecting character builds and the promise of future content keeps a portion of the player base engaged and hopeful. However, this optimism is challenged by a repetitive endgame loop and a lack of diverse, compelling activities to pursue once the main progression is complete, leading to calls for more dynamic systems.
Price-to-content ratio, DLC value, microtransaction fairness, and overall monetary value.
The community holds mixed feelings about the game's monetization, finding it to be a double-edged sword. While the cosmetic designs are often praised, many players feel the prices are too high and that the battle pass requires an excessive grind to complete. This creates a sentiment that the time or money invested doesn't always translate into a rewarding experience, causing players to question the overall value proposition.
Combined assessment of graphics, art style, sound design, music, and overall presentation.
Players generally admire the game's strong artistic direction, frequently praising the unique character designs, detailed environments, and appealing cosmetic items. This positive perception, however, is consistently undermined by technical shortcomings that affect the presentation. Widespread reports of graphical glitches, performance-related stuttering, and visual artifacts prevent the game's aesthetic from being fully appreciated by all players.
Originality, fresh ideas, creative design elements, and innovative approaches to gameplay or presentation.
The game's creativity is most appreciated in its character design, where unique aesthetics and diverse ability kits offer players fun new ways to engage in combat. However, this spark of innovation doesn't always extend to the core gameplay loop, which many players find to be repetitive and overly familiar. The community expresses a desire for more truly novel mission types and mechanics that would differentiate the game from others in the genre.
Quality of multiplayer gameplay, social features, community interaction, and online experiences.
The social experience is largely defined by a helpful and welcoming player base, which makes cooperative play enjoyable for many. However, the multiplayer infrastructure and content loop present significant challenges that temper this positivity. Technical issues like lag can disrupt co-op sessions, while a lack of compelling endgame activities leads to player attrition, making it harder to find groups and diminishing the social ecosystem.
Developer communication, update frequency, bug fixes, and overall post-launch support quality.
The community acknowledges that the developers are actively listening to feedback and making iterative improvements, which fosters a sense of goodwill. Despite this, players remain critical of the slow pace at which major issues are resolved, pointing to persistent balance problems, technical bugs, and a lack of truly new content. There's a prevailing feeling that while the developers are engaged, the execution of updates and fixes needs to be faster and more impactful to meet player expectations.