Final score is calculated by weighting and averaging all datapoints across multiple categories.
The fundamental gameplay experience including fun factor, mechanics, and technical performance.
The core gameplay experience is significantly hampered by persistent technical issues. Widespread complaints of poor performance, including frame drops, stuttering, and crashes, are a primary source of recent player frustration and detract from an otherwise engaging foundation.
Story quality, world depth, replay value, and overall content value.
Players find the game's content deep and engaging, with high replay value and a fair monetization model driving positive sentiment. However, concerns about endgame repetitiveness, the cost of cosmetics, and the campaign's length for alternate characters prevent universal acclaim.
Visual and audio quality combined with creative and innovative design elements.
Strong praise for innovative mechanics, such as the crafting and trade systems, is a key driver of positive sentiment in this category. However, the game's artistic and audio presentation, while appreciated for its style, is frequently undermined by significant performance problems and visual clutter.
Multiplayer features, social aspects, and developer support systems.
While players appreciate developer responsiveness and improvements to social features like trading, the overall community experience is dragged down by persistent technical issues. Server instability and performance problems hinder multiplayer enjoyment and create frustration with the pace of developer support for these core issues.
Our True-Review is based on 10 datapoints collected over multiple days. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance. These weighted scores are then averaged to calculate the final True-Review score.
You can look at the scores and weights and make adjustments to see where we derive the final from. Tinker, play, test and above all else - have fun!
Open Score TinkererOur reviews are based on comprehensive datapoint analysis collected over multiple days of community feedback and gameplay data. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance in the overall experience.
Learn more about our methodologyPure enjoyment and entertainment value of playing the game.
Detailed analysis based on community feedback and gameplay data.
Quality of primary gameplay systems including combat, controls, and core interaction loops.
Detailed analysis based on community feedback and gameplay data.
Game stability, optimization, frame rate, bugs, and overall technical execution.
Players report a highly inconsistent experience, with a significant portion of the community struggling with ongoing technical problems. The primary complaints center on persistent frame rate drops and stuttering that make intense combat feel unresponsive and frustrating. These performance issues, coupled with frequent game crashes, are not isolated incidents but recurring problems that disrupt gameplay and suggest a need for deeper optimization a year into the game's life.
Overall quality of story, world-building, characters, and narrative pacing across all content.
The core narrative, deep crafting systems, and immersive world-building are highly praised, providing a strong foundation that players find compelling. However, sentiment is tempered by concerns about the endgame, which some feel becomes monotonous or lacks clear objectives after the initial playthrough. The campaign's length, while great for a first run, is often cited as a tedious barrier when creating new characters, impacting the desire to experiment with different builds.
Amount of content, replayability factors, and long-term engagement potential.
Players feel the game has strong long-term appeal due to its deep character customization and complex endgame systems that encourage build optimization and mastery. The continuous cycle of progression keeps many invested for hundreds of hours, fostering a dedicated player base. Despite this, some players express that the mandatory campaign replay for new characters is a significant drag on replayability, and certain endgame loops can feel grindy without sufficient reward.
Price-to-content ratio, DLC value, microtransaction fairness, and overall monetary value.
The community generally feels the game offers excellent value, particularly praising its fair free-to-play model and accessible core mechanics that don't feel predatory. However, significant criticism is directed at the cosmetic microtransactions, which are widely considered overpriced and of lower quality compared to competitors. Players also express frustration with the high cost of essential features like skill respecs, creating a friction point that feels punishing for experimentation.
Combined assessment of graphics, art style, sound design, music, and overall presentation.
The game's art direction, atmospheric environments, and compelling soundtrack are frequently lauded for creating a rich and immersive world. Players appreciate the aesthetic, but this praise is often paired with frustration over technical shortcomings that undermine the presentation. During intense combat, visual clutter from ability effects combined with severe frame rate drops can make gameplay unreadable and detract from the otherwise high-quality visuals.
Originality, fresh ideas, creative design elements, and innovative approaches to gameplay or presentation.
Players widely celebrate the game's commitment to innovation, highlighting the evolving crafting systems and new class mechanics as fresh and engaging additions to the genre. The streamlined trade system is also seen as a major quality-of-life improvement that respects players' time. While the new systems are praised for their depth, some find the crafting mechanics to be overly complex or prohibitively expensive, creating a high barrier to entry for full engagement.
Quality of multiplayer gameplay, social features, community interaction, and online experiences.
The ability to easily group with friends and engage with the improved trading system is seen as a positive step for the game's social ecosystem. However, the potential for enjoyable cooperative play is consistently undermined by significant technical problems that have persisted well past launch. Players frequently report that lag, server instability, and performance drops are even more pronounced in multiplayer, making group content a frustrating experience rather than a rewarding one.
Developer communication, update frequency, bug fixes, and overall post-launch support quality.
The community acknowledges the developers' efforts in delivering regular content updates and quality-of-life improvements, often citing that player feedback leads to tangible changes. This active development fosters goodwill, but it is counterbalanced by frustration over a perceived lack of progress on long-standing technical issues. While players see the developers are adding content, the failure to resolve core performance problems like crashes and frame drops leaves many feeling that their most critical feedback is not being adequately addressed.