Soren7.28
41,539 sources over 45 days
Path of Exile 2 review (41.5k+ sources) scores it 7.28/10. It shines with strategic combat and deep customization but is hampered by a cumbersome trading system.
Share:
Review of: Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2: Weapon Swapping Ignites Dynamic Combat

09-AUG-25 - 1 month ago

True-Review™ Summary

Calculated Final Score

Final score is calculated by weighting and averaging all datapoints across multiple categories.

Soren
7.28
Based on 41,539 sources
A year on from its December 2024 launch, Path of Exile 2 has firmly established itself not merely as a sequel, but as a dominant force in the action RPG landscape. Recent community sentiment, analyzed over the past 45 days, paints a picture of a game whose core combat and customization are celebrated as a new benchmark for the genre. Players are reporting an experience defined by visceral, strategic combat and nearly limitless character-building potential. However, these same discussions reveal a game whose social and endgame systems are still evolving, with the community actively voicing its hopes for future updates. While the foundation is lauded as exceptionally strong, current player conversations are centered on whether the surrounding framework can be polished to the same brilliant sheen.

The Unrivaled Core: A Symphony of Combat and Customization

At the heart of the current Path of Exile 2 discourse is an overwhelming sense of satisfaction with its core gameplay loop. Players consistently describe the combat as a monumental achievement. The system feels weighty and deliberate, where every dodge-roll and attack carries significant impact. The standout feature, which has become a central topic of praise in recent weeks, is the weapon-swapping mechanic. Gamers report that this single innovation has fundamentally transformed the ARPG experience, allowing for two distinct six-link skill setups to be switched between instantaneously. This creates a dynamic flow in battle that players find incredibly engaging, enabling complex strategies and on-the-fly adaptation that simply wasn't possible before. One moment, a player might be a hulking melee juggernaut, and the next, a swift, ranged spellcaster, all without changing their core character build.

This mechanical depth is amplified by what the community considers to be an evolution of the series' legendary customization. The new skill gem system is frequently praised for its clarity and power, empowering players to craft truly unique and viable builds. Online forums and community hubs are buzzing with players sharing their latest creations, from shapeshifting druids who seamlessly weave between human and bear forms to elemental archers who swap between devastating fire and ice attacks. The consensus is clear: the sheer joy of theory-crafting and then executing a powerful, personalized build is the primary reason players are logging in day after day. It’s this potent combination of strategic combat and deep personalization that has cemented the game's core experience as its most celebrated pillar.

How Does the World of Wraeclast Hold Up a Year In?

The journey through Wraeclast continues to be a highlight for many adventurers. Players describe the game's atmosphere as relentlessly grim and captivating, a true successor to the dark fantasy tone of the original. The campaign's narrative and the detailed environments are often cited as major sources of immersion. The world feels dangerous, ancient, and filled with secrets, compelling players to push forward. However, when discussions turn to the long-term experience, some friction points emerge. Based on current player sentiment, the endgame content loop, while robust, is beginning to feel repetitive for veteran players. Many in the community express a desire for more variety in the activities available after the main campaign concludes. While the established systems are solid, players are hopeful that future updates will introduce new mechanics or diverse challenges to keep the long-term grind feeling fresh and rewarding, ensuring the world remains as exciting to engage with on the thousandth hour as it was on the first.

What Makes Path of Exile 2 Stand Out Visually and Mechanically?

From a presentation standpoint, Path of Exile 2 is widely regarded by its community as a stunning technical achievement. Players frequently report being impressed by the massive leap in graphical fidelity over its predecessor. The new engine brings the world to life with fluid animations, detailed character models, and lighting effects that make the dark dungeons and corrupted landscapes feel more menacing and alive than ever. This visual overhaul isn't just for show; gamers note that the improved clarity and smoother performance directly enhance the gameplay experience, making chaotic battles more readable and satisfying. Beyond the visuals, the innovation extends deep into the game's mechanics. The aforementioned weapon-swapping system is consistently hailed as a revolutionary idea that sets a new standard for combat design in the genre. This, combined with the refined skill system and the introduction of new movement options like the dodge roll, has players feeling that Path of Exile 2 is not just a prettier version of the original, but a true, innovative evolution.

Is the Community Aspect a Help or a Hindrance?

While players celebrate the solo journey, the social and economic aspects of Path of Exile 2 are currently the most significant source of community frustration. Recent discussions are heavily focused on the state of the in-game trade system, which many players describe as cumbersome and inefficient. The process of buying and selling items is seen as a major point of friction that detracts from the core enjoyment of slaying monsters and finding loot. This sentiment is echoed in discussions about group play. While the combat is thrilling with friends, the tools for finding and forming parties for specific content are reported to be lacking. Players express a strong desire for more streamlined social features and a quality-of-life overhaul for the trade system. The community appears optimistic that the developers are listening to this feedback, but for now, these social systems are viewed as a critical area in need of improvement to elevate the entire experience to the high standard set by its gameplay.

Category Analysis

Core Experience

7.55

The fundamental gameplay experience including fun factor, mechanics, and technical performance.

The core experience is defined by a highly enjoyable and engaging gameplay loop with deep build diversity, but is significantly hampered by persistent technical performance issues and clunky mechanics in certain combat areas.

Content & Immersion

7.08

Story quality, world depth, replay value, and overall content value.

Players appreciate the game's strong content foundation, fair value, and replayability, though sentiment is tempered by concerns over a repetitive endgame and overly complex or random crafting systems.

Presentation & Innovation

7.49

Visual and audio quality combined with creative and innovative design elements.

The game's presentation and creativity are widely praised for its striking aesthetics and innovative mechanics, but the experience is held back by recurring technical glitches and a desire for more variety in enemies and items.

Community & Social

6.08

Multiplayer features, social aspects, and developer support systems.

Community sentiment is mixed; while players are optimistic about the game's future and appreciate the developer's philosophy, ongoing technical issues impacting multiplayer and a desire for clearer communication prevent stronger satisfaction.

Pros

  • A visceral and strategic combat system, revolutionized by a dynamic weapon-swapping mechanic.
  • Unparalleled character customization and build diversity that fuels endless player creativity.
  • Stunning modern graphics and a grim, atmospheric world that is deeply immersive.
  • Innovative gameplay mechanics that meaningfully evolve the action RPG formula.

Cons

  • The in-game trading system is a significant source of friction and is described by players as cumbersome.
  • Social features and group-finding tools are considered underdeveloped, hindering seamless cooperative play.
  • For some long-term players, the current endgame content loop is beginning to feel repetitive.

True-Review™ Datapoints Analysis

Our True-Review is based on 10 datapoints collected over multiple days. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance. These weighted scores are then averaged to calculate the final True-Review score.

Fun Factor

Weight:
350
Score:
8.40

Pure enjoyment and entertainment value of playing the game.

Players find immense joy in the game's deep customization, frequently highlighting the thrill of discovering powerful skill combinations and unique character builds. The core loop of combat and progression is considered highly addictive and rewarding, keeping players engaged for long sessions. While some find certain mechanics or parts of the campaign to be a bit of a slog, the overwhelming sentiment is that the freedom to experiment and master different playstyles makes the game a consistently entertaining experience.

Core Gameplay Mechanics

Weight:
100
Score:
6.80

Quality of primary gameplay systems including combat, controls, and core interaction loops.

The game's combat system is a source of both satisfaction and frustration for the community. Players celebrate the strategic depth offered by the vast build diversity, finding it rewarding to craft a character that excels in combat. However, this praise is tempered by persistent complaints about the feel of certain mechanics, with melee combat often described as sluggish and unresponsive. Frustrations also arise from unreliable projectile targeting and defensive options that feel inadequate against certain enemy types, indicating a need for mechanical refinement.

Technical Performance

Weight:
100
Score:
5.33

Game stability, optimization, frame rate, bugs, and overall technical execution.

Technical performance remains a significant point of division within the player base, particularly after recent updates. While a portion of the community enjoys a smooth and stable experience, many others are plagued by persistent issues like stuttering and sudden frame rate drops that disrupt gameplay. Console players, in particular, report frequent crashes and audio bugs, leading to widespread frustration. These ongoing technical problems detract from the overall quality and are a primary concern for a large segment of the community.

Content Quality & Pacing

Weight:
125
Score:
6.92

Overall quality of story, world-building, characters, and narrative pacing across all content.

Players are generally captivated by the game's rich world and compelling narrative, showing strong appreciation for the quality of the campaign and its characters. There is palpable excitement for future content expansions, demonstrating confidence in the game's direction. However, this enthusiasm is moderated by concerns over gameplay pacing, which can feel uneven or slow depending on the chosen character build. The crafting system is also a common point of criticism for being overly complex and unintuitive for many players.

Replay Value & Longevity

Weight:
75
Score:
7.36

Amount of content, replayability factors, and long-term engagement potential.

The game's extensive character customization and build variety are the primary drivers of its strong replay value, encouraging players to start new characters to explore different playstyles. Community optimism is high due to the ongoing development and the promise of future content additions. Despite this, some players find the current endgame loop becomes repetitive over time and lacks clear long-term goals. The randomness of the crafting system and the demands of the seasonal model also create accessibility barriers for more casual players.

Value & Monetization

Weight:
50
Score:
7.08

Price-to-content ratio, DLC value, microtransaction fairness, and overall monetary value.

The community largely agrees that the game offers excellent value, with a fair upfront price and a non-intrusive cosmetic-based monetization model. Players feel they receive a substantial amount of quality content for their purchase. However, sentiment sours when discussing the in-game economy and progression systems. The crafting system is a frequent source of frustration, with players feeling that its heavy reliance on randomness makes meaningful progression feel unrewarding and overly grindy at times.

Visual & Audio Quality

Weight:
60
Score:
7.17

Combined assessment of graphics, art style, sound design, music, and overall presentation.

Players consistently praise the game's powerful aesthetic, from its detailed graphics and unique art style to its immersive and impactful sound design. These elements are seen as major strengths that significantly enhance the atmosphere and moment-to-moment gameplay. This appreciation is unfortunately undermined by persistent technical flaws, such as visual artifacts and audio bugs that have become more common after recent patches, particularly on consoles. While the core presentation is beloved, these technical hitches prevent it from being a flawless experience.

Innovation & Creativity

Weight:
40
Score:
7.97

Originality, fresh ideas, creative design elements, and innovative approaches to gameplay or presentation.

The community celebrates the game for its creative spirit and willingness to innovate on established genre conventions, with new mechanics like the universal dodge roll being frequently praised. The depth of character building and strategic possibilities fuels excitement and makes the gameplay feel fresh and engaging. While the overall reception is very positive, some players feel that certain systems, like character defenses, feel dated compared to the game's other innovations. There is also a desire for greater enemy variety and more unique item appearances to better reflect their power.

Multiplayer & Social Features

Weight:
60
Score:
6.33

Quality of multiplayer gameplay, social features, community interaction, and online experiences.

Players enjoy the fundamental experience of playing with others and are optimistic about the future of the game's social and multiplayer features, citing the developer's positive track record. The community feels engaged and looks forward to planned updates that will expand these systems. However, the current multiplayer experience is significantly hampered by the same technical issues affecting solo play, such as performance drops and stuttering. These problems can be even more pronounced in group settings, creating a frustrating experience that overshadows the fun of cooperative play.

Developer Support

Weight:
40
Score:
5.70

Developer communication, update frequency, bug fixes, and overall post-launch support quality.

Player sentiment towards the developers is complex, balancing appreciation for the core game and consumer-friendly monetization with frustration over post-launch support. While there is optimism for the game's future, many feel that critical technical issues, especially on consoles, are not being addressed quickly enough. The community also expresses a desire for more transparent and frequent communication regarding bug fixes and the content roadmap. This perception of slow responsiveness to major problems tempers the goodwill earned by the quality of the initial product.

Score Tinkering Tool

You can look at the scores and weights and make adjustments to see where we derive the final from. Tinker, play, test and above all else - have fun!

Open Score Tinkerer
Comments (0)
Please log in to post a comment.
Loading comments...

True-Review™ Methodology

Our reviews are based on comprehensive datapoint analysis collected over multiple days of community feedback and gameplay data. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance in the overall experience.

Learn more about our methodology

Path of Exile 2

Final Score:7.28
Analysis Period:45 days
Analysis Timespan:25-JUN-25 - 09-AUG-25
Data Sources:41,539
Review Date:09-AUG-25
© 2025 Soren Enterprises
AboutPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service