Final score is calculated by weighting and averaging all datapoints across multiple categories.
The fundamental gameplay experience including fun factor, mechanics, and technical performance.
The core experience is considered moderately positive because the fun, fast-paced combat and character abilities are consistently hampered by frustrating matchmaking, character balance problems, and ongoing technical performance issues.
Story quality, world depth, replay value, and overall content value.
Content and immersion receive a mixed reception as the engaging world and character variety are offset by concerns about long-term replay value, a stale competitive meta, and a monetization model that players find questionable in value.
Visual and audio quality combined with creative and innovative design elements.
Presentation is a strong point due to high praise for the game's art style, character designs, and audio, though the experience is slightly diminished by minor visual bugs and a desire for more innovation in the core gameplay loop.
Multiplayer features, social aspects, and developer support systems.
The social experience is mixed because the potential for team play is frequently undermined by poor matchmaking and negative player behavior, with a sentiment that developers are not addressing these persistent community issues quickly enough.
Our True-Review is based on 10 datapoints collected over multiple days. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance. These weighted scores are then averaged to calculate the final True-Review score.
You can look at the scores and weights and make adjustments to see where we derive the final from. Tinker, play, test and above all else - have fun!
Open Score TinkererOur reviews are based on comprehensive datapoint analysis collected over multiple days of community feedback and gameplay data. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance in the overall experience.
Learn more about our methodologyPure enjoyment and entertainment value of playing the game.
Players find significant enjoyment in the thrill of victory and the satisfaction of mastering a hero's kit, especially when playing with friends. The core appeal of the Marvel universe and its fast-paced action provides a strong foundation for exciting moments. However, this fun is frequently undermined by persistent matchmaking issues that create one-sided matches, where players feel helpless against unbalanced team compositions or overpowered characters, leading to significant frustration.
Quality of primary gameplay systems including combat, controls, and core interaction loops.
The fundamental combat mechanics are a highlight, with players enjoying the fast-paced action and the unique satisfaction of using iconic hero abilities. This positive experience is frequently disrupted by ongoing concerns about character balance, where certain heroes feel either dominant or ineffective, impacting strategic variety. Additionally, players report frustrations with control responsiveness, performance hitches, and matchmaking that can feel inconsistent or place them in matches with bots, detracting from the competitive integrity.
Game stability, optimization, frame rate, bugs, and overall technical execution.
The game's technical state is inconsistent across the player base, leading to a divided experience. While many PC players report a stable and well-optimized game, a significant number of users on both PC and console encounter persistent issues. Common complaints over the last month include frustrating lag spikes, stuttering during crucial moments, and various bugs that affect character abilities. Console players, particularly on last-gen hardware, frequently cite frame rate drops as a major problem that disrupts the flow of gameplay.
Overall quality of story, world-building, characters, and narrative pacing across all content.
Players are drawn to the quality of the game's world and the backstories of its characters, finding the overall concept and specific gameplay moments highly compelling. However, the pacing and flow of the experience are often disrupted by external factors, such as persistent matchmaking imbalances that lead to frustrating matches. Furthermore, concerns about the viability of certain characters and the perceived slow pace of progression can make the experience feel inconsistent and less rewarding over time.
Amount of content, replayability factors, and long-term engagement potential.
The game's replay value is driven by its fun core gameplay and a diverse roster of characters, with players remaining optimistic about future content additions. However, long-term engagement is currently hampered by frustrations within the competitive ecosystem, including poor matchmaking and a meta that can feel stagnant. Players express that beyond the seasonal battle pass, there is a lack of compelling endgame systems or a clear progression path to keep them invested for the long term.
Price-to-content ratio, DLC value, microtransaction fairness, and overall monetary value.
The monetization model receives a mixed reception, with players appreciating the value offered by the battle pass and the wide variety of available cosmetics. Conversely, there is significant community pushback against specific practices, such as the high price of cosmetic bundles and the controversial decision to sell visual effects separately from their corresponding legendary skins. These choices are seen by many as anti-consumer and detract from the perceived value of premium purchases.
Combined assessment of graphics, art style, sound design, music, and overall presentation.
The game's presentation is a strong point, with the community frequently praising the distinct art style, detailed character models, and evocative sound design. This positive view is slightly diminished by recurring technical problems, such as visual glitches and display bugs that can affect gameplay. Players also express a desire for more audio customization options and greater consistency in the quality of visual effects tied to cosmetic items.
Originality, fresh ideas, creative design elements, and innovative approaches to gameplay or presentation.
Players generally praise the game's creative foundation, particularly the design of new characters with unique abilities and the imaginative expansion of the game's universe. The community shows a clear appetite for more innovation, especially regarding new game modes and deeper customization. However, some players feel that certain hero kits are derivative or that the core gameplay loop has become repetitive, suggesting a need for ongoing innovation to maintain strategic depth.
Quality of multiplayer gameplay, social features, community interaction, and online experiences.
While the potential for engaging, strategic team play exists, the overall multiplayer experience is heavily marred by persistent issues. Players consistently report that poor matchmaking is a primary source of frustration, creating unbalanced matches that feel predetermined and unfair. This problem is compounded by negative player behavior, such as teammates frequently abandoning matches or exhibiting poor sportsmanship, which severely detracts from the social and competitive enjoyment of the game.
Developer communication, update frequency, bug fixes, and overall post-launch support quality.
Community perception of developer support is divided. Players acknowledge that the developers provide regular updates and have responded to certain feedback points in the past. However, there is a growing frustration that long-standing, core issues—such as matchmaking quality, character balance, and persistent technical bugs—are not being addressed with sufficient urgency. This leaves a significant portion of the player base feeling that their most critical concerns are being overlooked.