Final score is calculated by weighting and averaging all datapoints across multiple categories.
The fundamental gameplay experience including fun factor, mechanics, and technical performance.
The core experience is defined by a conflict between its engaging and intense gameplay loop and persistent technical issues. While players appreciate the fundamental mechanics and challenge, widespread performance problems, bugs, and frustrating AI behavior significantly detract from the overall enjoyment.
Story quality, world depth, replay value, and overall content value.
This category receives a middling score because while the game's deep mechanics and challenging progression offer strong replay value, the experience is often hindered by a repetitive grind and technical issues that disrupt immersion. Players generally find the game's value acceptable, but concerns about content stagnation prevent a more positive reception.
Visual and audio quality combined with creative and innovative design elements.
The game is recognized for its innovative hardcore concepts and immersive audio-visual design, but the execution is inconsistent. Persistent performance issues and audio bugs undermine the presentation, while some creative aspects feel repetitive, resulting in a mixed sentiment that appreciates the ideas but is frustrated by their implementation.
Multiplayer features, social aspects, and developer support systems.
The social and multiplayer experience is heavily impacted by persistent, unresolved issues like widespread cheating and poor online performance, which overshadow the potential for cooperative fun. While players acknowledge some ongoing developer support, there is a strong sense of frustration that these critical problems remain unaddressed, souring the community experience.
Our True-Review is based on 10 datapoints collected over multiple days. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance. These weighted scores are then averaged to calculate the final True-Review score.
You can look at the scores and weights and make adjustments to see where we derive the final from. Tinker, play, test and above all else - have fun!
Open Score TinkererOur reviews are based on comprehensive datapoint analysis collected over multiple days of community feedback and gameplay data. Each datapoint is scored and weighted according to its importance in the overall experience.
Learn more about our methodologyPure enjoyment and entertainment value of playing the game.
The core loop of high-stakes raids and the adrenaline of surviving intense firefights are frequently praised as the game's most compelling elements. Players find immense satisfaction in successfully extracting with valuable loot, and the recent addition of a PvE mode offers a less punishing way to enjoy the game's mechanics. However, this enjoyment is consistently undermined by deep-seated frustrations, primarily the prevalence of cheaters which can instantly negate a successful run. Persistent technical problems and the notoriously difficult learning curve also create significant barriers to consistent fun, leading to a volatile mix of thrilling highs and infuriating lows.
Quality of primary gameplay systems including combat, controls, and core interaction loops.
Players are drawn to the game's realistic and detailed gunplay, which, combined with its immersive atmosphere, creates a uniquely challenging hardcore experience. The fundamental mechanics of combat and survival are considered top-tier within the genre. This foundation is significantly weakened by long-standing issues with AI behavior, which players describe as wildly inconsistent, swinging between being easily exploitable and having superhuman accuracy. Furthermore, persistent performance problems like stuttering and low frame rates detract from the mechanical precision the game demands, causing frustration even for those with powerful hardware.
Game stability, optimization, frame rate, bugs, and overall technical execution.
Technical performance remains a major point of contention within the community, with many players reporting a frustratingly unstable experience. Frequent game crashes, particularly during crucial moments like loading into or extracting from a raid, are a significant source of anger as they can lead to the loss of character progress and gear. Widespread complaints about low and unstable frame rates persist, even on high-end gaming rigs, which directly impacts the fluidity of combat. These optimization issues, coupled with bugs affecting hit registration and connectivity, create a perception that the game's technical state is holding back its otherwise strong potential.
Overall quality of story, world-building, characters, and narrative pacing across all content.
The game's world is praised for its depth and the unique, high-stakes challenges it presents, which form the backbone of the player experience. However, the quality of this content is often perceived as being held back by significant technical and design flaws that disrupt pacing and immersion. Long loading times and jarring performance stutters can pull players out of the moment, while frustratingly inconsistent AI behavior undermines the carefully crafted atmosphere. For a game this established, players express a desire for a higher level of polish, feeling that these persistent issues prevent the content from being as compelling as it could be.
Amount of content, replayability factors, and long-term engagement potential.
The game's deep, complex systems and challenging progression path provide a strong incentive for long-term play, with many veterans enjoying the 'wipe' cycle and the pursuit of mastering the game. The promise of future updates and content additions also keeps the dedicated player base engaged and hopeful. However, this longevity is challenged by what many describe as a punishing and often repetitive grind required to advance. Concerns about periods of content stagnation between major updates, combined with the game's notoriously steep learning curve that can deter new players, temper the overall replay value.
Price-to-content ratio, DLC value, microtransaction fairness, and overall monetary value.
Players generally feel the base game offers a unique and substantial experience that justifies its initial purchase price. The discussion around value is more nuanced when it comes to the different editions of the game, with the benefits of the most expensive version being a frequent topic of debate regarding fairness and 'pay-for-advantage' elements. Recent controversies surrounding new offerings and how they interact with existing editions have also fueled community conversations about the developer's monetization strategy. Overall, while the core product is valued, the fairness of its tiered pricing structure remains a point of contention.
Combined assessment of graphics, art style, sound design, music, and overall presentation.
The game is widely praised for its presentation, with detailed environments and hyper-realistic weapon audio creating a deeply immersive and tense atmosphere. Players often cite the sound design as a critical and well-executed component of the tactical experience. Unfortunately, this quality is frequently undermined by persistent technical flaws. Visuals are hampered by performance issues like frame rate drops that ruin fluidity, while significant audio bugs—such as muffled or incorrect directional sounds—can be fatal in a game where hearing your enemy is paramount.
Originality, fresh ideas, creative design elements, and innovative approaches to gameplay or presentation.
The game is highly regarded for its innovative blend of hardcore survival and shooter mechanics, which has carved out a unique niche in the market. Players appreciate the deep, complex systems that lead to emergent, unscripted gameplay moments and the ongoing development of its lore. However, this creativity is seen as lacking in other areas, particularly in quest design, which many players find to be repetitive and uninspired. While the core concept remains fresh, some feel that certain elements, like the AI and mission structure, have not evolved enough and could benefit from more creative refinement.
Quality of multiplayer gameplay, social features, community interaction, and online experiences.
The cooperative aspect of forming a squad to tackle raids is a highlight of the multiplayer experience, fostering teamwork and communication. However, the overall social environment is heavily impacted by several persistent, negative factors. The prevalence of cheaters is a primary complaint, as it creates an unfair playing field and ruins the high-stakes nature of the game. Poor technical performance, including stuttering and lag, further degrades the online experience, while the brutal learning curve makes it incredibly difficult for newcomers to survive against seasoned veterans, creating a sometimes-hostile environment.
Developer communication, update frequency, bug fixes, and overall post-launch support quality.
The community acknowledges that the developers are actively working on the game, with recent improvements to AI and the addition of new modes being seen as positive steps. This ongoing development fosters a sense of optimism among a portion of the player base that the game will continue to evolve. However, this is balanced by significant frustration over the perceived slow pace of fixes for long-standing issues, especially regarding server performance, optimization, and critical bugs. Players often feel that their feedback on core problems is not addressed quickly enough, leading to a feeling that developer priorities are sometimes misaligned with the community's most pressing concerns.